Dolphins/Chiefs (denied by Brianeal23)

Dolphins get:
Derrick Johnson 90 olb
Peerless Price 77 wr
3rd round rookie
6th round rookie

Chiefs get:
Chris Chambers: 88 WR
Zach Thomas: 97 MLB

CHEECHREBORN wrote:

Dolphins get:
Derrick Johnson 90 olb
Peerless Price 77 wr
3rd round rookie
6th round rookie

Chiefs get:
Chris Chambers: 88 WR
Zach Thomas: 97 MLB

Are you kidding me?

Chris Chambers = Johnson
Zach Thomas>>>>>>>>Price,3rd, and 6th

The Chiefs need to add more here IMO...

I know the age difference between Johnson and Thomas is substantial, but the 7 pts difference in rating more than makes up for that...

Price is no spring chicken and will not be improving...Chambers is worth more than he is getting credit for in this deal IMO...

Take out the late round pick and add a 2nd rounder...That will even this one out in my eyes...I just think KC is getting a very solid WR for dirt cheap

derrick johnson is 24 years old. that is ten years younger than thomas. thomas will play a max two years. Chambers is 29 years old and will start to decline probably after this year or next.

I can approve it as it is. If he takes out the 6th rounder and made it a 4th rounder it would be aight, but i wouldnt say a 2nd rounder would need to be put in there.

im gonna say no too, johnsons age is nice and all but WR is an important position and MLB>OLB, and if your going to bring up the age thing, then Price is like 5 years older than Chambers. And Zach Thomas is a beast either way (top 3 MLB in the game) I think that the 3rd and 6th should be switched to a first

add a 1st and 2nd rounder

max1 wrote:

add a 1st and 2nd rounder

is that a joke?

Add more or the deal is canceled

DC wrote:

Add more or the deal is canceled

can i have a rebuttle to my last arguement

CHEECHREBORN wrote:

DC wrote:

Add more or the deal is canceled

can i have a rebuttle to my last arguement

you could try but I really dont see how you could convince these people that its a fair trade

Lebronzoom wrote:

CHEECHREBORN wrote:

DC wrote:

Add more or the deal is canceled

can i have a rebuttle to my last arguement

you could try but I really dont see how you could convince these people that its a fair trade

What he said^^

I'm gunna approve of this, I think its fair and DJ is definatly better than Chris Chambers just for the record.

Brianeal23 wrote:

I'm gunna approve of this, I think its fair and DJ is definatly better than Chris Chambers just for the record.

I think we've already had three no's

Cav
me
DC

Then someone like you lock it up and edit it to denied lol.

well we should see if he wants to rework things first, like we all made suggestions

Brianeal23 wrote:

I'm gunna approve of this, I think its fair and DJ is definatly better than Chris Chambers just for the record.

!!!!

Lebronzoom wrote:

im gonna say no too, johnsons age is nice and all but WR is an important position and MLB>OLB, and if your going to bring up the age thing, then Price is like 5 years older than Chambers. And Zach Thomas is a beast either way (top 3 MLB in the game) I think that the 3rd and 6th should be switched to a first

Price is only one year older than chambers.

midnitemike wrote:

Lebronzoom wrote:

im gonna say no too, johnsons age is nice and all but WR is an important position and MLB>OLB, and if your going to bring up the age thing, then Price is like 5 years older than Chambers. And Zach Thomas is a beast either way (top 3 MLB in the game) I think that the 3rd and 6th should be switched to a first

Price is only one year older than chambers.

2 years

Thomas 97 = Johnson 90, 3rd (and thats generous, thats 0.7 ovr pts per age when it should be more like 0.5)

Chambers 88 = Price 77, 6th???

this is it broken down and I dont like it at all

This trade would break down to this
I gain:
-A star LB who will play 1 or 2 years max
-An aging reciever who is at his prime and will begin to deline

I lose:
-The best young LB in the game. 24 year old star who will lead his team for years.
-3rd and 6th rounder
-A deepball threat in price

Lebronzoom wrote:

Thomas 97 = Johnson 90, 3rd (and thats generous, thats 0.7 ovr pts per age when it should be more like 0.5)

Chambers 88 = Price 77, 6th???

this is it broken down and I dont like it at all

that makes no sense. in two years Williams will be at thomas level is now (AT THE AGE OF 26)!! while thomas wont even be in the league!!

he might have a carrear ending injury!

CHEECHREBORN wrote:

This trade would break down to this
I gain:
-A star LB who will play 1 or 2 years max
-An aging reciever who is at his prime and will begin to deline

I lose:
-The best young LB in the game. 24 year old star who will lead his team for years.
-3rd and 6th rounder
-A deepball threat in price

dont call price a deepball threat than say about chambers an aging receiver who will begin to decline. Chambers is an isane posesion receiver. And Price has 92 speed, he isnt a threat with those wheels
No DJ isnt the best young LB. Briggs>DJ

you gain:
-one of the best posesion receivers in the game
-the third best MLB in the game

you lose:
-some terrible picks
-a one hit wonder WR
-an up and coming LB

you guys act like chambers is God. i know price isnt great but how long do you honestly thing that chambers will be where he is at now?